Friday the 13th conference explores oil train fears

Oil trains are an esoteric topic, but that does not mean they do not pose a significant threat to our safety and the environment. A frightening topic and only appropriate that the "Oil Trains 2015: Community Risks & Solutions Conference" was on Friday the 13th of November. It was also appropriate that the conference was held in Pennsylvania (Pittsburgh, specifically), considering that 1.5 million Pennsylvanians live within a half-mile of tracks that carry crude oil, with most of these people living in environmental justice communities, according to this PublicSource article quoting PennFuture policy director, Matt Stepp. 

So why is this conference important? Why should Pennsylvanians worry about oil trains? 

Well, there are many reasons. For residents of western Pennsylvania, there's the significant issue of crumbling infrastructure. Built in 1904, the Fort Wayne Railroad Bridge connects the north shore of the city to the heart of downtown Pittsburgh above the Allegheny River. Rob Walters of Three Rivers Waterkeeper points out that there is decaying and cracked concrete with exposed rebar on each of the piers that fasten the bridge to the riverbed along with widespread rust and holes throughout the underside of the bridge. Aging infrastructure such as rail lines and bridges are cause for concern, but when the cargo is crude oil, the risks are greater. If a train carrying crude oil derailed on this bridge, the resulting explosion would have a catastrophic impact on the environment and the 130,000 people who live and work within the half-mile evacuation zone of the bridge. 

As one can see, aging infrastructure combined with the inherent risks of oil trains can have devastating consequences such as those from the deadly Lac-Mégantic derailment disaster in 2013. Under the Rail Safety Improvement Act and subsequent regulations issued by the U.S. Department of Transportation, the federal government yields authority for bridge inspection and oversight to the owners of the bridges. However, the federal guidelines provide no minimum design standards for bridge construction for the owners to follow. In addition, the “competent persons” evaluating the bridges and developing bridge management plans for railroads are not required to have minimum qualifications such as an engineering degree, and federal officials do not need to be informed when railroads conduct bridge inspections and find safety issues. 

Not only do oil trains pose threats to our environment, but the proximity of crude oil trains to schools also pose substantial health risks to individuals in nearby communities due to emissions of fine particulate matter. According to Healthy Schools Pennsylvania, there are 316 schools in southwestern Pennsylvania within a one-mile radius of an active rail line. Alternatively, 81 school districts in the region have an active rail line within a one-mile radius of at least one school in that district. Crude oil trains vent carcinogens and other toxic gases into the atmosphere, but the new federal requirements announced in May 2015 do nothing to address this threat to public health.

Other regions in Pennsylvania are just as susceptible to these dangers, particularly southeast Pennsylvania. For instance, Philadelphia Energy Solutions is the nation’s largest consumer of fracked oil from North Dakota’s Bakken shale, with about 60 to 70 oil trains crossing Pennsylvania to deliver crude oil to refineries around Philadelphia each week. Crude oil trains pose a risk to the water supply in Philadelphia along the Schuylkill River. They also travel within close range of the Limerick Nuclear Power Plant, where a spill could threaten cooling water intake.

So is Pennsylvania doing anything about this? 
Some progress has been made, but more is needed. U.S. Sen. Bob Casey is asking two freight railroad companies, CSX and Norfolk Southern, to reduce speeds to 35 m.p.h. for oil trains traveling through major urban cities like Philadelphia and Pittsburgh. Gov. Tom Wolf commissioned Allan M. Zarembski, a University of Delaware expert, to explore responses to a massive increase in oil train traffic and to assess ways to lower risks of derailments. He acknowledged that the state has limited leverage over federally regulated railroads but is seeking ways to reduce the risks. 

The Heinz Endowments, ForestEthics, and FracTracker Alliance convened this conference and training for environmental groups across the nation to come together to discuss how oil trains affect their communities. Discussions focused on how we can build a network to help make this issue a priority for Pennsylvanians as well as other states. Regulatory and oversight efforts at the state and federal level are important, but we must all be aware of the trains, their risks, and factors like inspections, infrastructure, and proximity to densely populated areas including schools. We must also ask how communities are to be protected and hold officials accountable. 

If you are interested in hearing more about the speakers from the conference, videos are now available on YouTube.

Annie Regan is western Pennsylvania outreach coordinator for PennFuture and is based in Pittsburgh. She tweets @MsAnnieRegan.

Citizens from PA, OH, WV show overwhelming support for EPA methane rule at public hearing

Concerned parents, public health advocates, faith leaders, students, and environmentalists from Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia applauded the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) proposed rule to cut methane emissions from the oil and gas industry at a public hearing held by the agency in downtown Pittsburgh on September 29. Media outlets including the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Harrisburg Patriot-News, Observer-Reporter (Washington County), and StateImpact PA covered the hearing.

Rob Altenburg, director of the PennFuture Energy 
Center, testifies at the EPA hearing alongside 
Energy Policy Analyst Jennie Demjanick

The agency's hearing in Pittsburgh was one of three held across the U.S., with the other two in Denver and Dallas the previous week. Citizens packed two hearing rooms at the William S. Moorhead Federal Building, where many spoke in support of the federal rule as they encouraged the administration of Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf to do more to rein in these harmful emissions. Testifiers in support of the rule outnumbered those against, 92-2. Testimony by PennFuture Energy Center director, Rob Altenburg, can be found on our website.

The proposed rules seek to cut methane emissions 40 to 45 percent by 2025, from 2012 levels. Methane is a potent greenhouse gas – up to 84 times more so than CO2 in the first 20 years after its release into the atmosphere. The oil and gas sector is the largest industrial source of methane pollution in the nation. Methane emissions combine with toxic co-pollutants to form ground-level ozone, or smog, which leads to negative health impacts including asthma, lung and heart disease - illnesses that disproportionately affect children, the elderly, and under-served populations.

“The EPA's proposed methane rules are a good first step but Pennsylvania can and must do more to reduce this harmful pollution,” said Larry Schweiger, president and CEO of PennFuture. “Pennsylvania needs to adopt its own best-in-the-nation standards to cover both new and existing sources of emissions from the thousands of oil and gas wells in our state. We should use this momentum to accelerate the transition to a zero-carbon, clean energy future – our children's futures depend on it.”

PennFuture CEO Larry Schweiger testifies at EPA hearing

“Strong rules that mandate a reduction in methane will mitigate climate change and help improve air quality and public health,” said Joseph Otis Minott, Esq., executive director of Clean Air Council. “EPA’s efforts are a good first step that will provide a backstop to safeguard public health and clean our air using technologies that already exist. At the same time, the rules will not tackle the thousands of tons of methane pollution currently leaking from Pennsylvania’s expansive gas industry because they will only apply to new or modified gas facilities while expecting voluntary cooperation from operators of existing sources. Pennsylvania needs to act quickly to address both new sources of methane pollution as well as existing natural gas infrastructure. As the second-largest natural gas producing state in the nation, we will accept nothing less.”

“As a registered nurse and health care professional, the EPA's proposed methane rules will aid in primary prevention to reduce asthma and other respiratory illnesses which are exacerbated by harmful methane emissions and their toxic co-pollutants,” said Dr. Peggy Berry, PhD., MSN, RN. “The fight for improved health is one we are waging actively in my state, Ohio, and throughout the region and country. It's time for the oil and gas industry to clean up its act and stop jeopardizing the health and welfare of our communities and landscapes. As registered nurses and health care professionals, we thank the EPA for taking this step in the right direction.”

Sr. Donna Zwigart speaks at #CutMethane rally

"Our leaders must continue the transition to truly clean, renewable energy that is already taking place,” said Sr. Donna Zwigart of the Sisters of St. Francis. “In the meantime, a strong, unwavering commitment from Gov. Tom Wolf and our elected leaders including Sen. Bob Casey to forcefully tackle both carbon and methane pollution is the kind of action that will show Pope Francis that Pennsylvania means business and will lead the fight against climate change.”

"The youth across the nation and world are addressing our governments and leaders – now, loudly,” said Sage Lincoln, student activist at the University of Pittsburgh. “You cannot leave us gasping for breath amid polluted air. You cannot let our fears become reality. The time to act in Pennsylvania, and nationally, is now. As we support the EPA's methane rules, the youth ask Gov. Tom Wolf to lead in Pennsylvania with the strongest state methane rules possible. It is OUR future that is in the hands of our leaders and they must not delay.”

The EPA will be accepting public comment on the proposed methane rule through November 18.

Elaine Labalme is strategic campaigns director for PennFuture and is based in Pittsburgh. She tweets @NewGirlInTown.